readingInformation About the 2005 TUDA Reading Assessment
reading: summary
reading: urban district results
reading: student group results
reading: district comparisons
reading: sample questions
mathematicsInformation About the 2005 TUDA Mathematics Assessment
mathematics: summary
mathematics: urban district results
mathematics: student group results
mathematics: district comparisons
mathematics: sample questions
information for
information for: media
information for: parents
information for: educators
information for: researchers
information for: policymakers
tuda learn more
tuda learn more: about naep
tuda learn more: about urban district
tuda learn more: downloads & tools
tuda learn more: glossary
tuda learn more: help

Percentages of Students in Urban Districts Identified, Excluded, and Assessed in Reading

NAEP has always endeavored to assess all students selected as a part of its sampling process, including students who are classified by their schools as students with disabilities (SD) and/or as English language learners (ELL) or limited English proficient (LEP). (LEP students are sometimes called English language learners). The decision to exclude any of these students is made by school personnel. School personnel are encouraged to use inclusion criteria provided by NAEP and may discuss their inclusion decisions with NAEP field staff. Some students may participate with testing accommodations.

The percentages of students excluded from NAEP may vary considerably across states and districts, as well as across years. Comparisons of achievement results across districts and within a district across years should be interpreted with caution if the exclusion rates vary widely. For example, at grade 4, the exclusion rates in Austin and Houston varied from those of the other districts.

Read more about the NAEP inclusion policy.

 

Percentages of all students identified as students with disabilities and/or English language learners, excluded, and assessed, grade 4 public schools: By urban district, 2002
 

2002

District

Percentage of all students identified

Percentage of all students excluded

Percentage of all students assessed

Percentage of all students assessed with accom-
modations

Percentage of all students assessed without accom-
modations

SD and/or ELL

       

 

Nation

21

7

14

4

10

Large central city1

28

8

20

4

17

Atlanta

8

2

6

1

5

Austin

Boston

Charlotte

Chicago

30

9

21

5

16

Cleveland

District of Columbia

19

8

11

5

5

Houston

43

17

26

1

25

Los Angeles

51

8

43

2

41

New York City

22

8

14

8

6

San Diego

SD only

       

 

Nation

13

5

8

4

4

Large central city1

12

5

7

3

4

Atlanta

5

1

4

1

3

Austin

Boston

Charlotte

Chicago

16

4

12

4

8

Cleveland

District of Columbia

14

7

7

4

3

Houston

12

4

8

1

7

Los Angeles

11

3

8

2

5

New York City

14

5

9

6

3

San Diego

ELL only

       

 

Nation

9

2

7

1

6

Large central city1

19

5

15

1

13

Atlanta

4

1

3

#

3

Austin

Boston

Charlotte

Chicago

19

7

12

2

9

Cleveland

District of Columbia

7

3

4

2

3

Houston

36

16

20

#

20

Los Angeles

46

6

40

1

38

New York City

11

6

6

3

3

San Diego

— Not available. The district did not participate or did not meet the minimum participation guidelines for reporting.

# The estimate rounds to zero.

1 Some of the TUDA districts include a few public schools located outside of large central cities as defined by the Census Bureau (population of 250,000 or more within metropolitan areas). These schools are included in the category of "large central city" for all years, but were not included in previously published results. As a result, some numbers reported on this website may differ slightly from those reported earlier on the web and in print.
NOTE: SD = students with disabilities. ELL = English language learners. Students identified as both SD and ELL were counted only once under the combined SD and/or ELL category, but were counted separately under the SD and ELL categories. Prior to 2005, students were identified as either ELL or non-ELL; in 2005 students were identified as ELL, non-ELL, or formerly ELL. Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2002 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.

Download and Print

Print This Page Download Reading Report Download Mathematics Report